Holding Strengths

What’s already good? How can we protect and strengthen that?
What could be better? How will we make it so?

I centered NaBloPoMo 2023 on these questions and set all 30 prompts/topics in advance. The idea was to take an Appreciative Inquiry approach to habit change at both the personal and collective levels. I wanted to shift focus from threats, failures, deficiencies, and shadow to people, places, and practices that thrive, uplift, and inspire. How could this mindset help us all in our current state?

From the Center for Appreciative Inquiry:

WHAT IS APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY?
Appreciative Inquiry (AI) is an energizing and inclusive process that fosters creativity through the art of positive inquiry. It builds new skills in individuals and groups, develops new leaders, encourages a culture of inquiry, and helps create shared vision and purpose by building on an organization’s core values and strengths. Perhaps, most importantly, are the outcomes that emerge during the process which provoke action, inspire commitment, and lead to results.

WHY APPRECIATIVE INQUIRY WORKS
Building upon the framework of positive psychology and human sciences, Appreciative Inquiry builds self-awareness and emotional intelligence to shift our focus, attention, and energy into exploration into opportunities and possibilities. AI does not focus on changing people, rather it invites individuals to engage in building a future they want to live in.

Appreciative Inquiry’s assumption is simple: Every human system has something that works right–things that give it life when it is vital, effective, and successful.

What I like about this approach to problem solving is the concreteness. Asking what already works, what’s not wrong or broken, requires practical, operational answers. It forces us to think and talk objectively about what is, rather than cogitate, theorize, and catastrophize about what could be. It starts from a place of strength and looks to build; it’s about what we’re for more than and before what we are against, so we can dream and design what could be instead.

At first I imagine applying this method to policy and systems collaboration. That would be great, but I don’t see it happening; people are still too negative, polarized, and adversarial for that, at least on large scales. I bet there are small organizations and groups where this strengths based approach to change actually already happens. I’d love to see more of them highlighted in the media.

For now, I think some of us may be ready and willing to apply appreciative inquiry to our existing relationships. I imagine a Blue friend and a Red friend, both wishing to connect across their differences and get closer. Both harbor curiosity about the other, even if it’s repressed. Each senses an intuitive possibility for deeper connection, and also feels stymied at how to achieve it. What if they started by considering the strengths of their relationship? Maybe those include honesty, non-judgment, good humor, and shared experiences. What if they imagined and envisioned together what an even stronger friendship would look, sound, and feel like? I get goosebumps envisioning those conversations.

What other domains of relationship would benefit from this approach to disagreement, challenge, conflict, and growth? I can think of at least a few in my life–she writes sheepishly–hello, walk the talk much? How fascinating! And here I thought this post would be boring and bland–HA!

I Hold Strengths for Us tonight, my friends: Strengths in relationship, in connection, in bond and union. Our relationships save us. I am convicted to this assertion, and I firmly believe it’s our strong relationships, especially across difference and disagreement, that will save our republic.

5 thoughts on “Holding Strengths

  1. Pingback: Holding Accountability | Healing Through Connection

  2. Hi Catherine

    There is much to be hopeful (Thankful!) for in this model. Mostly because it happens for most of us all the time! Whatever challenge we confront–from the trivial to the profound–after the initial shock or frustration of the moment we often move to problem solving. What to do to overcome? How can I/we fix it? If it cannot be made perfect how can we at least make it better? In effect, apply our skills, assets, attitudes and effort to make the situation better and move forward.

    I focused in particular on the following excerpt you provided… “AIencourages a culture of inquiry, and helps create shared vision and purpose by building on an organization’s core values and strengths.

    In business (or other organizations) invariably strategy begins with values, mission and strengths. What are “we” are about and what are we good at. This really is a way of saying the organization is not good at everything, has limited resources, and cannot achieve everything…but they can achieve somethings.

    Purpose meets positivity! I am fond of an admittedly somewhat trite aphorism–don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. By making an effort, listening, meeting half-way, showing goodwill it is pretty amazing how trust can be built. Make the situation better, make the relationship better. Most of life is an exercise in the art of the possible. Whatever differences we might have (or think we have) with others, it is interesting how often we find that we have much more in common than differences.

    It is frustratingly true, as you note, larger institutions–public policy bodies especially–can be maddeningly slothful to change and improve. But heck, we can make a difference in the immediate world around us and the people we are fortunate enough to be with. That’s something. 🙂

    Every person can make a difference, and everyone should try.”

    —John Kennedy

    All the best,

    Jamie

    Liked by 1 person

    • OH that JFK saying is one of my favorites! It expresses *agency with purpose*… the answer to “‘I’m only one person, what can I do,’ said 7 billion people.”
      I will respectfully tweak the assertion that organizations are mission driven– sometimes that mission is primarily to make money, which I don’t count as a high valuable mission… Because I think of the mission as what you are willing to sacrifice other things to accomplish–so if the primary mission is to make money, then all kinds of things are risk for sacrifice: ethics, integrity, safety, and interests of humans involved… That is a deeper conversation, however…
      This also brings up bureacracy, which I think you can I can likely agree a lot about. There are ideals, mission, and then practical matters–what can actually be *done*….
      SIGH. Complexity. We need to tolerate and manage it much, MUCH better!!

      Like

  3. Pingback: Holding On | Healing Through Connection

  4. Pingback: Holding On | Healing Through Connection

Leave a reply to Jamie Cancel reply