Susceptible

How do you assess risk?

For a long while now I have thought of risk in terms of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. For any given challenge, any individual (or collective) may have certain baseline predispositions for a certain consequence or outcome. The intersection of those innate properties with the external environment and conditions then create the actual outcome(s). This post is about self-awareness and self-regulation in service of mitigating risk in two situations: Infection and severe mental stress.

Infection

When was your last COVID vaccine? There have now been two booster vaccines available after the initial doses back in 2021. In the current endemic state of the virus, repeated vaccination feels less urgent than before. Some will continue to say ‘always’ or ‘never,’ but most of my patients want to discern more thoughtfully. I advise situationally. The following applies not just to COVID, but for any infection we may contract in the wild:

Intrinsic risk: What is your overall state of health? How many risk factors for infection and complication do you have (eg advanced age, respiratory illness, diabetes, other immune compromise)? What are your nutrition, exercise, and sleep habits, generally and now, and do they protect you or make you vulnerable (sleep deprivation and high mental stress increase risk)?

Extrinsic risk: What is your likelihood of exposure, in terms of intensity, duration, and novelty? What is your access to healthcare in case of severe illness? How would infection impact your function, livelihood, and the health and function of those around you (and what are their intrinsic risks, if you were to expose them)?

I did not get my second COVID booster until right before I traveled to Taiwan last month, even though it’s been available since last fall. It was mostly due to inconvenience, though I also did not want to spend a whole day in bed (my reaction to this vaccine), and I assessed my risk of infection and complication to be low. Then Husband got infected at the same time that Friend told me all about her severe and prolonged experience with long COVID, and I learned that cases in Taiwan were still fruequent and severe. I would be traveling alone with Daughter, who has asthma, spending 20+ hours each way and all days in country in crowded airports and public spaces. So while I had no overt intrinsic health risks, I was moved to vaccinate by both subjective and objective extrinsic factors.
I prioritized sleep the week before and all through traveling. I minimized caffeine intake. We wore KN95 masks in all public spaces throughout the trip and washed hands vigilantly. COVID infection during international travel is no joke, and we took no chances. Thankfully, we arrived back home uninfected and healthy.

When thinking about any infectious disease, I consider goals and trade offs. How important is it to avoid this illness, in general and right now? What are we willing to do and not do to prevent infection? What are the real costs of prevention and potential costs of illness? How can I minimize my susceptibility in a realistic, pragmatic, and balanced way? As a physician, I must consider infection impact not just on an individual’s health, but on public health as well.

Severe Mental Stress

In recent years, I have added a slide on distress tolerance to my wellness presentations. Practices like cold water to the face, paced breathing, and progressive muscle relaxation can help de-escalate us in the throes of acute emotional hijack, helping us get back from fight or flight to thinking clearly and acting reasonably. We have all encountered situations when we feel overwhelmed, out of control, and powerless. We each have our own unique triggers and reaction patterns, whether it’s performance anxiety, phobia, vicarious trauma, or simply rage, sadness, shame, etc.

Intrinsic risks for severe acute mental stress include history of trauma, tendency to avoid uncomfortable feelings, difficulty managing and expressing feelings or thoughts, and baseline anxiety, depression, etc.

Extrinsic risks for emotional hijack include inciting events that trigger past trauma reactions, often subconsciously. This could be anything from seeing someone else experience the harm you endured, to simply entering an environment similar to one in which you felt unsafe before. Certain words or gestures can trigger us–it can literally be anything. We each have a different threshold in any given situation, depending on the intersection of our current state, baseline traits, and real time conditions.

Susceptibility to mental stress, however, goes beyond simply passive innate attributes coming in contact with inciting circumstances. We all have our stress tendencies, many of which we can only partially control, if at all. Here is where our daily patterns, habits, and practices can really save us. Sleep deprivation and dehydration make everything feel exponentially worse, in my observation. Regular physical activity regulates the autonomic nervous system and improves sleep quality. Moderation of caffeine and alcohol help mitigate these substances’ disruptive effects on brain and body. Consistent self-assessment of mood and energy, what affects them, and anticipating challenges and threats on the horizon can increase confidence in our ability to meet them. Practices such as mindfulness, prayer, and communion with loving others also boost resilience–both mental and physical. And we cannot overestimate the profound importance of healthy, strong, and loving relationships to hold us up through anything life may bring.

For mental stress, while intrinsic psychological risks matter, our strong and consistent habits in the 5 reciprocal domains of health can (sleep, exercise, nutrition, stress management, and relationships) combine in synergy to minimize (or at least mitigate) our susceptibility to acute emotional hijack. Mindset, self-talk, communication skills, and attunement to others in daily life can set us up generally to encounter adversity feeling grounded and solid or vulnerable and insecure.

Thus, in addition to intrinsic and extrinsic risks, intrinsic assets also matter. The more we strengthen them when things are easy, the more easily we can call them forth when things get really hard.

I remind myself that though dividing risk into intrinsic and extrinsic is clear and helpful, it is also an oversimplification. History of trauma is not innate to me as a person, but the experience is integrated into my nervous system. Repeated subjective experiences accumulate and integrate further. I have, one could argue, adapted to it all in a way that protects me from recurrent harm in the future by alarming my system, mind and body, to similar threats, perceived and real. And while I practice my centering, grounding, inner peace methods, it also behooves me to honor and embrace my natural, un-peaceful tendencies. My best outcomes occur when I hold these all in dynamic balance, with nonjudgmental awareness and self-regulation. Anticipation, preparedness, and seeking support from trusted others also help mitigate my susceptibility to adverse outcomes and suffering.

In the end, I wish for all of us to live more peaceful, self-aware, self-efficacious lives. I want us all to move through good fortune with joy, and through adversity with fortitude and confidence, even while we allow ourselves to fully feel fear and distress. As an advanced practice in this domain, the better we understand our own intrinsic vulnerabilities and the conditions which expose them, and manage them effectively, the more likely we may recognize the unique struggles of others. We may all suffer less when these skills help us see, hear, and understand one another more empathically, compassionately, intimately, and lovingly.
We can, if we choose, help minimize one another’s susceptibility to pain and suffering.

Recentering—Vaccine post #3

IMG_4476

NaBloPoMo 2018:  What I’m Learning

When you buy a red car suddenly you notice so many red cars on the road.  I write two posts on vaccines, and now I see all these vaccine posts on my Facebook feed. One made me sad for multiple reasons.

Dr. Jennifer Chuang , a pediatrician who ran for the state legislature in New Jersey, posted this:

In 2017, I was moved to run for office in the NJ State legislature because of bills being introduced that were harmful to public health. Among the areas that I stood firm on were the importance and safety of vaccinations, and I was harshly attacked for that, even threatened.
However, NJ should not be proud of introducing the most pieces of legislation that would have made our children at risk for vaccine preventable illnesses. The current measles outbreak in New Jersey has now grown to 18 cases. Legislative decisions have consequences, especially to public health.

“From 2011 to 2017, New Jersey lawmakers introduced the most pieces of legislation that would make it easier for children to skip vaccines, according to a new study by Drexel University researchers.”

She linked to this article, detailing the anti-vaccine legislative history in New Jersey and lawmakers’ rationale, compared to the scientific literature.

I’m sad that there is such a fight against proven public health initiatives, and I’m sad that legislative bodies, who write our health and medical policies, include remarkably few clinicians.  But I’m most sad at the meanness in the fights.

A woman immediately commented, “Shut up already” on Dr. Chuang’s page.  When challenged benignly by others, she replied telling them to fuck off and calling them assholes.  Her page is apparently public, so I visited.  The posts that I could see were vehemently opposed to vaccines of all kinds, at least in 2016 and 2017.  She apparently lost a son this year, in his 24th year of life.  She has posted about eating healthy, self-care, and seeing intelligence as ‘not because you think you know everything without questioning, but rather because you question everything you think you know.”  So while I feel acutely put off and dismissive of her vile reaction to Dr. Chuang’s post, I also imagine that she and I may have things in common and might even be friends, if circumstances facilitated.

Somehow I came across another woman’s page tonight, similarly militantly anti-vaccine.  She and the first woman both posted a lot of memes and sayings implying that people who advocate for vaccines are brainwashed and ignorant, and not worthy of engagement.  Huh.  Sounds to me just like many of the ad hominems hurled by vaccine advocates against women like them.  It’s exhausting.  Who does it help, this mutual shit-flinging?  In Rising Strong, Brené Brown points out the pitfalls of false dichotomies and binary decision trees.  If you hear people shouting that you have to choose one side or another, that it’s all or nothing, be suspicious.  Look for the beneficiaries of that feud.  Often it’s the politicians who leverage our warring tendencies to stay in office.  Or maybe it’s physicians who, when they refuse to care for patients who decline vaccines, can feel decisively self-righteous rather than uncomfortably ambivalent.  Or maybe it’s the anti-vaccine parent, who feels embarrassed to express fear and uncertainty (because she has been shamed too many times for questioning a sanctimonious medical community), and so finds her voice in combative rage instead.  And could it be that anytime one of us shows up in attack mode, we incite our counterpart to take a mirroring stance, even if that was not their original intent (this is a rhetorical question)?

Regardless, I’m tired.  Social media and loud, mean, public debate are not venues that yield any meaningful interactions (I see the irony of my writing this on a blog).  It feels too slow, but experience teaches me that we win hearts and minds face to face, quietly, intimately.  Nothing good ever comes from a collision of two oncoming bullet trains.  It’s wildly destructive more than anything else.

Thankfully, my good friend posted Max Ehrmann’s poem “Desiderata” tonight.  I first read, transcribed, and posted this poem on my wall in high school, and have not seen it in a couple decades.  It really captures the essence of inner peace and right relationship, with self, humanity, and the earth, and it soothes me.  It’s a late Thursday night of another long week.  I leave you with Mr. Ehrmann’s master work below.  Good night.

Desiderata

Go placidly amid the noise and haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible without surrender
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly;
and listen to others,
even the dull and the ignorant;
they too have their story.

Avoid loud and aggressive persons,
they are vexations to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain and bitter;
for always there will be greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.

Keep interested in your own career, however humble;
it is a real possession in the changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs;
for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you to what virtue there is;
many persons strive for high ideals;
and everywhere life is full of heroism.

Be yourself.
Especially, do not feign affection.
Neither be cynical about love;
for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment
it is as perennial as the grass.

Take kindly the counsel of the years,
gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit to shield you in sudden misfortune.
But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline,
be gentle with yourself.

You are a child of the universe,
no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.

Therefore be at peace with God,
whatever you conceive Him to be,
and whatever your labors and aspirations,
in the noisy confusion of life keep peace with your soul.

With all its sham, drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.

Max Ehrmann, Desiderata, Copyright 1952.